Saturday, February 28, 2009

Getting Closer!

The latest update about voting rights for the citizens in Washington, D.C. from The League of Women Voters:

DC Voting Rights Is Moving Quickly

The District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2009 is moving quickly through Congress. The Senate passed the bill late on February 26. Despite this victory, the fight is not over yet. In fact, it has only just begun! The House of Representatives is slated to begin debate on the bill and a vote is expected to be scheduled as soon as possible.

In order to keep you updated on all the happenings with the legislation in the House (HR 157) we're going to be posting new alerts and information on our site regularly. Click here to go straight to our action page. Check back often so you can be sure Congress knows you support DC Voting Rights!

Also, please send this message to other concerned citizens - your grassroots network, friends and coworkers. Encourage them to contact their Representatives today!

BACKGROUND

Learn more what the League has done to support DC voting rights.

Sign up to receive Action Alerts directly by email. Don't miss an opportunity to take action! It's easy to sign up and the League will never share your email with others: https://member.lwv.org/Subscribe.asp.

For additional information, please contact LWVUS Grassroots Lobbyist Christina Vamvas at lobbying@lwv.org.

Action Alert #111-4, House, GLC, 02/27/09

Sunday, February 22, 2009

A Non-Answer from the FCC

Obviously, they didn't read my letter. They don't answer my questions about the research in this email. But, they sent me a nice 15 page pdf file, with pictures showing you how to hook up to your outside antenna.

Oh yeah, new information about those too. Apparently "the performance of outdoor antennas can degrade over time due to exposure to the weather." So not only do you have to shell out $350 now, you'll have to do it again, in who knows how long. What a bunch of B.S.!

Here's the lengthy non-response from the FCC:

You are receiving this email in response to your inquiry to the FCC.

Dear Consumer:

During the transition to digital TV, many stations are temporarily operating at reduced power levels. If you are not receiving certain digital TV stations, this does not necessarily mean there is a problem with your antenna or receiver.

The digital television (DTV) transition refers to the requirement that all full-power television broadcast stations stop broadcasting in analog format and broadcast only in digital format on or before June 12, 2009. Broadcast stations in all U.S. markets are currently broadcasting in both analog and digital. If you are having difficulty receiving digital broadcast stations in your area, try these troubleshooting tips on reception of digital signals.

Check Your Connections

o Check that your digital-to-analog converter box or digital television is connected properly. Make sure your antenna is connected to the antenna input of your digital-to-analog converter box or digital television. If using a digital-to-analog converter box, also ensure that the antenna output of your converter box is connected to the antenna input of your analog TV. Refer to the owner's manuals of your components if you are unsure of the proper connections.

o Ensure that your components are plugged in and have their power turned on.

o If you have a digital-to-analog converter box, tune your analog TV to channel 3. You should see a set-up menu or picture displayed on your TV screen. If you do not see a set-up menu or picture, tune your TV to channel 4. If you still do not see a set-up menu or picture, recheck your connections.

Perform a Channel Scan

o Digital-to-analog converter boxes and digital televisions have a button, usually on the remote control, that is labeled "set-up" or "menu" or some similar term. Press that button to access the set-up menu. Using the directional arrow buttons on your remote, scroll to the option that allows you to perform a "channel scan." The channel scan will search for digital broadcast channels that are available in your area. Consult the owner's manual of your digital-to-analog converter box or digital television for detailed instructions on how to perform a channel scan for your device.

o Once the channel scan is complete, you will be able to tune to the digital channels received by your antenna. You should perform a channel scan periodically to check whether additional digital channels have become available.

Adjust Your Antenna

o Small adjustments to your antenna can make a big difference in the number of digital channels you can receive. If you have an indoor antenna, try elevating it and moving it closer to an exterior wall of your home. After adjusting your antenna, perform another channel scan to see if your reception is improved.

o While adjusting your antenna, it may be helpful to access the "signal strength meter" on your digital-to analog
converter box or digital television to determine whether your adjustments are improving the signals' strength. The signal strength meter is usually accessed through the menu feature on your remote control. Refer to the owner's manual of your device for detailed instructions on how to access its signal strength meter. Remember to do another channel scan after you have adjusted your antenna.

o Television stations broadcasting in digital use both the VHF band (channels 2-13) and UHF band (channels 14-51). Many indoor antennas use "rabbit ears" for the VHF band and a "loop" or "bow-tie" antenna for the UHF band. Make sure you are using an antenna that covers both the VHF and UHF
bands and have connected it properly.

If You are Still Having Difficulty:

o On or before June 12. 2009, some stations will be operating at reduced power levels. If you are not receiving certain digital TV stations, this does not necessarily mean there is a problem with your antenna or digital to-analog converter box or digital television. Check with the TV station to find out whether they are planning changes that will improve reception.

o When an analog TV signal is weak or receives interference, static, snow, and distortion will often appear on the screen. Digital broadcasting will provide a clear picture; however, if the signal falls below a certain minimum strength, the picture can disappear. This "cliff effect" means that if you watch analog TV stations that have static and distortion, you may have to adjust or upgrade your antenna system.

o Simple indoor antennas provide minimal performance that may not be suitable for your location. If you are unable to obtain satisfactory reception with your current indoor antenna, you may wish to obtain an indoor antenna that includes features for better reception of UHF signals and/or an amplifier to boost the received signal (often referred to as an active indoor antenna).

o Generally, an outdoor antenna will get better reception than an indoor antenna. However, the performance of outdoor antennas can degrade over time due to exposure to the weather. If you are having problems, check for loose or corroded wiring, broken antenna elements and that the antenna is pointed in the right direction.

o Try to keep the length of wire between your antenna and digital-to-analog converter box or digital television as short as possible for best reception.

o "Splitters" that are used to connect a single antenna to multiple digital-to-analog converter boxes or digital televisions reduce the amount of signal available to each device. If you are having problems, check whether reception is improved without the splitter. In some cases an "active" splitter that includes an amplifier can solve the problem.

o If you are near a station's broadcast tower, reception of that station, as well as other stations, can be impeded by signal "overload." Consider using an "attenuator" or removing amplifiers to improve your reception.

o If you decide to replace or upgrade your indoor or outdoor antenna, many types are available from electronics retail stores at a variety of prices. Websites such as web.org/" target="_blank">http://www.antennaweb.org/ provide information on the locations of broadcast towers and the types of outdoor antennas appropriate for the stations you wish to receive. If you need assistance with upgrading your antenna system, check with a local antenna retailer or antenna installer.

Thank You


This e-mail contains an attachment that is in ".pdf" format. If you are unable to open this attachment, it is most likely because your computer doesn't have Adobe Reader, which is the program needed to open these types of files. You can install a free copy of Adobe Reader from the Adobe Web site at http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html.

Mailout Attachment Name : DTVMAILOUT.PDF (see attachment )
Representative Number : TSR55

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Good News Petey! (Well, some)

Looks like our Senators are taking up an important vote for the citizens of Washington, D.C.! Petey Greene would have a lot to say about this!
Senators are poised for a critical vote on DC voting rights legislation. A cloture motion requiring the support of 60 Senators will hit the Senate floor on Tuesday, February 24. If cloture fails, the Senate will not even be able to consider this vital voting rights measure.
—From The League of Women Voters 02.19.09

Urge your Senators to Vote to give citizens of Washington, D.C. representation in Congress! It's LONG overdue.

More From LWV:
Voters in our nation's capital are not afforded the same rights as voters in the rest of the country. Citizens of the District of Columbia pay U.S. taxes, fight and die for the U.S. during wartime, and are governed by the laws that Congress passes. And yet they have no voting representation in Congress.

Read more about this, and lots of other great things too, on The League of Women Voter's website. The Kalamazoo League is one of the BEST in the country. It has the GREATEST group of women committed to making democracy work in our community. THAT'S one of the greatest untold stories of our city — maybe I'll tell it. Someone should!

AND NOW, FOR THE OUTRAGEOUSLY BAD NEWS

There was also a horrifying, racist cartoon in the New York Post today. The message was extremely ugly, and ignorant. Blatantly racist seems a mild way to describe it.

The message is terrifying. They can say it, but we can loudly object and demand action. The editor MUST be fired! Go to Color of Change to read and take action.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Switch to Digital TV Disenfranchises the Poor

Here it is — finally my rant about "the big switch" compacted into 500 words for the Gazette. I could still re-write it a million times!


In all the chatter about Digital TV, we’re only getting half the conversation. Everyone is focused on the consumer’s readiness, when the focus should be equally, if not more, on the broadcasters readiness. This narrow focus was also seen in the February 8 edition of the Gazette’s Homelife section, and in a viewpoint from the Saginaw Press.

This is not a quick set-top box fix for the estimated 15 million people who rely on receiving free broadcast news and weather. (Broadcasting that all citizens are entitled to in exchange for granting stations a license to use the public airwaves.) These millions are, for the most part, poor. They can’t afford a monthly cable bill, and certainly cannot bear the burden of the cost to install the rooftop antenna they will need to continue receiving many of the signals they now enjoy.

The most recent reports now tell us that at least 2% of viewers currently covered by existing analog signals will not receive the digital signal from the same stations. The real problem is that the FCC did not require broadcasters to duplicate their analog signals. This is crucial information citizens should have had when the conversation about this switchover began. And, it’s the missing side of the story — information broadcasters — and other media outlets — are keeping from consumers.

Michael Copps, our acting FCC Chair, was recently quoted as saying “Some consumers, through no fault of their own, are going to lose one or more channels as a result of the transition. That we did not understand this better long ago through better analysis, tests and trial runs is, to me, mind-boggling.” The FCC did testing, but the analysis was flawed because it assumed that everyone who receives analog TV has a rooftop antenna. But, the truth is that 75% of those consumers use indoor antennas (so 2% could really be 73%). The estimated cost to have a rooftop antenna installed is $350.

I discovered after hooking up my converter box, that I will loose many stations I currently rely on — two of them major networks (NBC & CBS) — stations that come in clearly for me now. It has been impossible to get an answer as to why, and I find it incredibly frustrating that this information is just now reaching the public.

According to the Associated Press, broadcasters could easily fix this “lost signal” problem through a number of options including fill-in stations. With these low cost minor adjustments by broadcasters, a converter box would be sufficient.

This “switch” will affect people with low and fixed incomes most of all. Think about people living in apartment buildings that don’t provide cable service. Even if they had the income to purchase an antenna, how would it be installed on the roof of a building shared with others? And what happens when they move?

I encourage you to write to your representatives and the FCC now. Demand that broadcasters make these easy fixes before the switch to digital TV in June.

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Word Play


I’ve been fooling around with some of those little word magnets. You know the ones that you’re supposed to arrange into poetry on your refrigerator? I’m calling mine “Motivational Kitchen Counter Poetry.” Since my refrigerator has no space, arranging them on the counter is much easier. And, I’m forced to look at them everyday because they’re in my way.

Susan helped me get it started a couple of months ago when we broke apart a panel of motivational words from a conference I attended years ago. We hoped that arranging them would give us some insight into our psyches after a conversation about our families. It’s funny that I’ve been so intrigued by it because I’ve “hated” poetry for many years now. It hasn’t always been that way. I even wrote a bit of it when I was a young, disturbed teenager — and left it behind when I left my husband in my late 30s.

While I haven’t revealed my psyche (or have I?), the intrigue has apparently penetrated it. A poem that cracked me up all day, just popped into my head when I started my usual Saturday routine of listening to my favorite NPR programs. The anticipation of the Listener Limerick Challenge and the weeks experience with “counter words” combined into this:

Saturday Sounds on the Hill

Wait wait…don’t tell me!
Whad’Ya Know?
There’s Car Talk
in This American Life

It’s still making me chuckle. If you’re a Michigan Radio listener, you might be too. If you’re not, it probably doesn’t make any sense at all.

Confined to “motivational” words, I came up with two poems. They started on the counter and have moved to my refrigerator now. They’re not works of art, but I had fun looking at the limited choices and putting something together that has nothing to do with “success,” “determination” or “110%.” (Or DO they!?)

Chance Victory of Great Difference

Every reach for the dream is
opportunity to change
up your limit
give your destination at the sky


What Purpose Love?

Never give my heart limit
don't believe life
dare imagine a strength you expect —
find fullest dreams together

That was my creative spurt for the week. I think all the sunshine is getting to me. Yay sunshine!

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Petey Greene

I always think of Petey Greene as being from Detroit. Maybe it's because I grew up in the 60s and remember all the energy and change that took place during that time — across the country and Michigan. Petey Greene was not from Detroit, he was from Washington, D.C. And I have to say, nine minutes into the Independent Lens presentation of ADJUST YOUR COLOR: The Truth of Petey Green, "Talk to Me" with Don Cheadle didn't even begin to tell this story!

This is great timing for me after two-and-a-half days of anti-racism training. First, let's think about how people in Washington, D.C. do not have a true voice in our government. (They do not vote for representatives of Congress, but instead have a NON-VOTING delegate). Petey wanted to talk to his fellow D.C. citizens. He gave them a voice when theirs was non-existent.

And, his voice was so important! He changed media in a profound way. He started in radio, then moved to cable access (need a link here about how it's funded and why it's important — more likely a whole new entry!). Howard Stern did "black-face" on his show while Petey called him an ignorant cracker, and yes, he used other offensive language, but it was (and still is) an offensive time. It was honest. It changed things. He started a conversation about race, and our history, through observations of the chaos of his time.

Go Petey — wish you were still here with us. I'm thankful for your awesome break-through — just wish your TRUE American story was still widely told. Maybe it will make a comeback and help a new generation of people talk with each other about their history. It's 40+ years past time to start that conversation again.

Sunday, February 1, 2009

First After Second


This should have been my first post, not my third. The one that tells you right away that I am not a writer. I struggle with how to arrange words and thoughts into cohesive sentences. I can't spell, I suck at grammar, and my knowledge of punctuation is very limited. It's very hard work!

I've been working on a — rant/letter/viewpoint/blog — about the switch to digital TV. I refuse to pay for television and so I'm one of millions that will be screwed over when the switch happens. I'm pretty pissed-off about it and I'm trying to articulate the reasons why — and at the same time educate the — public/congress/the President/family/friends — about why.

But, I've written, re-written, added, subtracted, rearranged and mixed it up, and still can't get it to come out simple and powerful. Maybe I need to take my emotion out of it. I'm not sure, but I don't think the blog is going to be something I find myself posting to very often. Writing in my journal is more satisfying (I love the act of writing long-hand), and I don't have to worry about whether or not my audience understands it!